Monday, August 30, 2010

September 1, 2010

1. We went to the computer lab to take a survey for class. 


If you weren't here, you nay take the surveys at  
and 
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/J6ZSQ5D
 
  1. Click on the link for the first survey.
  2. Make sure you type your name and period information in the box at the top of the page.
  3. Answer each question only in the first column.  (Do not mark in any other column.)
  4. When you are finished click on “Done.”
  5. Go back to cavereading.blogspot.com and click on  the other survey, following the same directions.

 
2. We read/listened to an article about "phonagnosia" at
 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128412201&sc=fb&cc=fp

3. We learned about noticing our inner voices as we read.  Students  read an article about  Truth in Research and noticed (and wrote about) their inner voices as they read. 
A Conversational voice interacts with the story.  It is a Useful voice when you are trying to read.  A Waste-of-Time Voice is Fake Reading and is going on when you are not really reading, but are thinking about different things.   See Stop #1 in the article below.

4. Students did Independent Reading and we continued individual testing. (in B2)

For #3 -- Article for Truth in Research: 

SIRS Discoverer ® on the Web
Copyright © 2010 ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved.
Read
(Vol. 59, No. 3)
Oct 2, 2009, pp. 30-31

Copyright © Weekly Reader Corporation. Oct 2, 2009. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

Truth in Research

By Craig Nadler

• How to find the facts you need online
You've just been assigned a research project. You have the deadline and the topic. What's next? That's right--the research! Although it may seem daunting at first, thorough investigation into a topic can make or break your project. In the 21st century, we often head straight to the computer to begin our research online, where there are literally millions of places to cruise to for information. But while the Internet provides a fast and easy medium through which to gather data, you should always use caution when maneuvering along the electronic information superhighway. Anyone can publish a Web page, and there's no one policing cyberspace to verify that the content is the truth.

Take time to examine each site with care. Remember that Web pages are susceptible to change, and they can move or disappear without warning. Print out any pages that contribute to your research in order to ensure that your bibliography is complete and accurate. You can also call on the help of librarians, who can guide you to trusted research sites.
Stop #1  Stop reading and notice what your mind has been doing as you read.  Has it been paying attention or wandering?  Were you using any strategies to focus or to help yourself understand?  Be honest.  Minds wander.  It will help you if you can notice what's going on in your own thinking.  Write down a couple of sentences about what was going on in your mind as you read the first part.  Do the same for the other three parts of this article. 

I recently came across an article on the Web that claimed a man named John Hanson was the first president of the United States. Hanson had been the first president of Congress in 1781, but could he really be considered the first president of the United States? I thought, "I really need to check out this source?" I used an online research checklist to analyze the credibility of the article. I looked beyond the text to see whether the site's information was reliable. Here's what I discovered.

Content with the content?

As I read the article that defended John Hanson as the first president of the United States, I kept an eye out for citations or hyperlinks in the text that supported the information provided. There were none. I also took note of opinion words, such as definitely, which took away from the serious tone of the article: "George Washington was definitely not the first President of the United States."

Who has the right to write?

After reading the article, I scanned the page for the author's name. The piece was an excerpt from a book. This excerpt's Web site was not controlled by George Grant, who penned the original piece the site referenced. I knew I had to be careful because I didn't have the original source in front of me.
Stop #2

Purpose shmurpose

The Web site--www.marshallhall.org--where I found the article was "[dedicated to the Preservation and Restoration of Historic Marshall Hall in Charles County, Maryland." What exactly does that have to do with the first president of the United States? It didn't seem that my goal matched the site's goal. I needed to rethink its reliability.

Who's in charge?

I could not find any contact information for the Web site's director, a mysterious Peggy Marshall. No information about her life or credentials is provided!

Link me where?

I checked out the provided links, but none of them steered me toward information about the identity of the first president. They were either dead or irrelevant to my topic.

After some online digging, it was clear that this site was not a reliable source of information. It failed too many points on the checklist. I wasn't going to trust this source.
Stop #3

Vocab

SUSCEPTIBLE: subject to some influence

CREDENTIALS: evidence of authority or status

Check a Web Site's Credibility

• AUTHOR: Search for the author's name somewhere on the Web site. Look for a link to his or her home page. Maybe you can find a biography or a list of credentials.

• PURPOSE: Find the goals of the site or the motives behind its creation.

• ACCURACY: Try to verify the material on the page, either with your own knowledge or with alternate sources. Look for primary sources--letters, records, or other documents created during the period that is being studied. Also, check the site for grammatical, spelling, and typographical errors.

• OBJECTIVITY: Try to find the author's point of view, and determine whether the Web site is fact (supported by other sources) or opinion (uses emotion-rousing words).

• CURRENTNESS: Find out when the page was last updated to ensure that its material is current.
• LINKS: Check out the links provided to see whether they are current and relevant to your research.

Stop #4

Great site for showing how some sites can be unreliable: 
http://allaboutexplorers.com/home
For instance, read about Lewis and Clark.  Can you believe it?

Thursday, August 26, 2010

August 30, 2010

August 30, 2010
 

1. Bell-Ringer/Roll:  

Can You Believe Everything You Read?

Students read an article and answer questions.

2. Computer Lab  --  IN CLASS you will come to this blog post, then take the survey at
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/F9752TD  
Oops!  The survey didn't work.  We teachers will tweak it and try again next time.

3. We discussed the article about believing everything we read. 

4.  Supported Independent Reading time and Reading Assessments


Next time: Reading information from the Internet:  Do you have phonagnosia?

August 26, 2010

August 26, 2010
Today in class students filled out an "Initial Self-Assessment."
They prepared folders to be kept in class.

We watched part of a Brian Regan comedy routine about reading.
  He showed examples of visualizing, thinking through your reading, and using word attack skills.
He gave an example of increasing the speed of reading while losing comprehension (understanding).

Students received their disclosure documents.  The disclosure signatures and VIP form should be returned by September 1.

We did a book pass so students could sample some of the books in our classroom.

Teachers and Rotations for Reading 7

You will have three teachers this semester for Reading 7.  If you begin with
Ms. Dorsey, you will go next to Mrs. Fugal, then to Ms. Gadd.
If you begin with
Mrs. Fugal, you will go to Ms. Gadd, then to Ms. Dorsey.
If you  being with
Ms. Gadd, you will go to Mrs. Dorsey, then to Mrs. Fugal.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Book Recommendations (My Summer Reading)

Follow this link to books I read this summer and other book recommendations and lists:

Summer Reading Lists

Extra Credit

According to one of the posts on this blog from this month (August),
what do "Readers. . . " do when the text is hard?

Five points of extra credit will be given to  each of the first five people to tell me the answer by email or face-to-face.  This offer expires September 3.  

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Readers. . .

  • read many different kinds of texts.
  • always have a purpose for their reading -- and read for many different purposes.
  • sometimes read more than one book at a time.
  • finish books.
  • like to own books.
  • know what they will read next.
  • get ideas about what to read from magazines, newspapers, television, awards, lists, book stores, and other readers.
  • have favorite books and authors.
  • reread books they love.
  • don't finish books they don't like -- but they give them a good try first and know exactly whey they didn't like them.
  • know what to expect from the type of book they're reading.
  • read books they didn't choose differently form books they chose for themselves.
  • slow down and reread when the text is hard.
  • ask for help if the text just isn't making sense.


from Nancy Allison in Middle School Readers: Helping Them Read Widely, Helping Them Read Well 

Expectations for Supported Independent Reading Time

  • Have a book on your desk ready to read when reading time begins.
  • Log in your reading log before you begin reading.
  • Read for the entire reading time.
  • Log out on your reading log and complete your response assignment.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

2010-2011 Year Begins



Stuff from the 2010-2011 year:
Link to our wiki for B2 2nd semester 3nd rotation --
http://reading72011r3.pbworks.com

Don't forget that your PowerPoints must be ready to show on May 19.

No more late, revised, or make-up work will be accepted after May 27.